There are three criteria that a veteran must meet in order to receive service-connected compensation from the Veterans Administration (VA):
- A Current Disability. There must be a current disability, one that has been diagnosed by a medical professional;
- An Event In Service. There must be evidence in the military service records of the occurrence or aggravation of a disease, injury, or event in service; and,
- Medical Nexus Evidence. There must be a nexus, or link, between the current disability and the in-service disease, injury or event; i.e., the veteran must present medical evidence that the current disability and the in-service disease, injury or event are related. See Epps v. Gober, 126 F.3d 1464, 1468 (Fed. Cir. 1997); Caluza v. Brown, 7 Vet. App. 498, 506 (1995).
Medical nexus, or service connection, basically it means that the evidence establishes that a particular injury or disease resulting in disability was incurred coincident with service in the Armed Forces, or if preexisting such service, was aggravated therein. The standard of proof by which a veteran needs to show that his current medical condition is related to his military service is a medical opinion that “it is as likely as not”. This literally means the reviewing doctor need only opine that there is a 50-50 likelihood of a relationship between the veteran’s current medical condition and his or her military service. See 38 U.S.C. § 5107(b), also known as the “benefit of the doubt” rule or standard. This is a much lower standard than in the usual standard for proving disability employed in the civilian world, and one that non-VA physicians may not be aware.
Evidence relating to a veteran’s claim is subject to the “benefit of the doubt” rule, codified at 38 U.S.C. § 5107(b) as follows:
The Secretary shall consider all information and lay and medical evidence of record in a case before the Secretary with respect to benefits under laws administered by the Secretary. When there is an approximate balance of positive and negative evidence regarding any issue material to the determination of a matter, the Secretary shall give the benefit of the doubt to the claimant.
Under this provision, where the pertinent evidence is in relative equipoise, or “approximate balance,” a claimant enjoys the benefit of the doubt and his or her claim for service connection will be granted.
Medical nexus may also be shown by “continuity of symptomatology,” whereby a veteran can satisfy the medical nexus criteria if he or she can demonstrate treatment for a particular disabling condition in the service via medical evidence, and can also show records of continuous treatment for the condition into the present. See 38 U.S.C. § 1101(3); see also 38 C.F.R. §§ 3.303(b), 3.309(a) (2008).
Categories
- Affordable Care Act
- Alzheimer's Disease
- Arbitration
- Attorney Ethics
- Attorneys Fees
- Beneficiary Designations
- Blog Roundup and Highlights
- Blogs and Blogging
- Care Facilities
- Caregivers
- Cemetery
- Collaborative Family Law
- Conservatorships
- Consumer Fraud
- Contempt
- Contracts
- Defamation
- Developmental Disabilities
- Discovery
- Discrimination Laws
- Doctrine of Probable Intent
- Domestic Violence
- Elder Abuse
- Elder Law
- Elective Share
- End-of-Life Decisions
- Estate Administration
- Estate Litigation
- Estate Planning
- Events
- Family Law
- Fiduciary
- Financial Exploitation of the Elderly
- Funeral
- Future of the Legal Profession
- Geriatric Care Managers
- Governmental or Public Benefit Programs
- Guardianship
- Health Issues
- Housing for the Elderly and Disabled
- In Remembrance
- Insolvent Estates
- Institutional Liens
- Insurance
- Interesting New Cases
- Intestacy
- Law Firm News
- Law Firm Videos
- Law Practice Management / Development
- Lawyers and Lawyering
- Legal Capacity or Competancy
- Legal Malpractice
- Legal Rights of the Disabled
- Liens
- Litigation
- Mediation
- Medicaid Appeals
- Medicaid Applications
- Medicaid Planning
- Annuities
- Care Contracts
- Divorce
- Estate Recovery
- Family Part Non-Dissolution Support Orders
- Gifts
- Life Estates
- Loan repayments
- MMMNA
- Promissory Notes
- Qualified Income Trusts
- Spousal Refusal
- Transfers For Reasons Other Than To Qualify For Medicaid
- Transfers to "Caregiver" Child(ren)
- Transfers to Disabled Adult Children
- Trusts
- Undue Hardship Provision
- Multiple-Party Deposit Account Act
- New Cases
- New Laws
- News Briefs
- Newsletters
- Non-Probate Assets
- Nursing Facility Litigation
- Personal Achievements and Awards
- Personal Injury Lawsuits
- Probate
- Punitive Damages
- Reconsideration
- Retirement Benefits
- Reverse Mortgages
- Section 8 Housing
- Settlement of Litigation
- Social Media
- Special Education
- Special Needs Planning
- Surrogate Decision-Making
- Taxation
- Technology
- Texting
- Top Ten
- Trials
- Trustees
- Uncategorized
- Veterans Benefits
- Web Sites and the Internet
- Webinar
- Writing Intended To Be A Will
Vanarelli & Li, LLC on Social Media